“Who LEAKED from the SITUATION ROOM?” – Epstein Book Turns Trump’s Team on Each Other – Ty

Inside the White House, freak out over Epstein files. This story dropped, a book that’s coming out. Umberto, can you verify the exact date this book is coming out? I think the book is coming out June 23rd. It’s called the regime change, and this book will be a massive book that everybody will be reading because it called out everybody in the White House with things that are going on with the Epstein files.

So, let me read some of the story for you guys on what’s in here. And then, Tom, I’m going to come to you because I know you’ve gone through the first five chapters. Inside the White House freak out over Epstein files. This is by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan. So, let me read some of this stuff to you. If you want to go to the article, so, let me read some of this stuff to you.

So, we go through a couple things here. Number one, they needed to a gesture of transparency to appease an increasingly angry base, but also a way to convey the message that the president was sympathetic to supporters’ concerns. Now, keep in mind, this is not a Trump supporter. All right, this is still New York Times. Never forget that.

So, let me go through it. J.D. Vance took a seat at the head of the table in the John F. Kennedy conference room in the situation room complex and said, “This is a huge problem.” He told the group, arrayed around him were the White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. Then, you have White House Counsel David Warrington, Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt.

Then, you had a few other people that are there and they’re having this conversation. And the Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair. Then, you have Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, Speaker of the House. Now, Tom, who do we do they share with everybody who the whistleblowers is in this article? ; No, they the the the articles become this giant book.

Um, and they don’t share exactly where they get the data from. But, when you look at this, and I’m not the only one, the people that have read um what I’m estimating at about five chapters of excerpts cuz the book doesn’t come out to June 23rd as you pointed out. What you see here is a very well-written and very well-presented synopsis of what went on. They have got multiple sources.

That’s my feeling here and the multiple sources appear to be rationally presenting things and they’re also showing you backstory on things that there are other events that they connected to. It’s like Bongino left the the the building on this day and went here and here and they’re like, “Wait a minute.

We talked to him here, then we talked to him there. Those dots connect.” ; So, zero to 10, what do you score the credibility of the facts of this book? ; Right now on its face about an eight and I don’t see any counter articles coming out, “Oh, you’re full of crap. Here’s the seven seven ways to pull the crap.” ; It’s still early.

So, maybe we get it between now and Monday. We’ll see. ; think there’d be somebody overnight that would get after this? ; I I think so, but it’s still it’s a little early, you know, sometimes people aren’t reacting. So, we’ll see what happens today. So, let me read through some of the stuff, folks, and then Tom, I’m going to come to you first cuz I know you’ve gone through the whole thing.

So, Vance had bought into the darkest theory about Epstein and a cabal of predators hidden within the country’s ruling class. Wiles would tell others that the vice president had proved himself to be a major conspiracy theorist, okay? That’s the story and then Vance floated to colleagues an extraordinary PR gambit. The White House should enlist Tucker Carlson to interview Epstein’s long-time girlfriend and co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, in prison.

Okay, better to rip off the band-aid instead of moving on. Let me continue reading on what happens here. Then it goes into, you know, what they were thinking about doing next. “Maxwell could be given a pardon,” he said, “or she could have her sentence reduced.” This is Warrington, the White House counsel, responded by laying out the available choices without advocating any of them.

At that several around the table spoke up to register their strong disapproval. Pardoning Maxwell, a trafficker of young girls, would create a huge PR problem. Steven Cheung said. He predicted that in the wake of the pardon, Epstein accusers would be fanning out of a TV telling their stories and ripping the administration to shreds.

Blair also adamantly opposed the pardon. We can’t offer Ghislaine Maxwell anything. Uh A, I don’t know why we would, and B, if we give Ghislaine Maxwell any sort of break whatsoever, and then she turns around and says nice things about us, or says nice things about us, and give her a break, it will undermine the entire point of her saying good things.

That will feed the conspiracy theory, period. If there’s nothing for her to say that hurts us, we shouldn’t have to offer her anything. It continues. Shortly after this, the president posted again he was going along with the plan, uh situation room. He didn’t like having to do it based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein.

I’ve asked Attorney General Pam Bondi. So, this is where Pam Bondi comes in to produce all of the pertinent grand jury testimony, uh the subject to the court approval. This is a scam perpetuated by Democrats, and should end right now. You remember this whole picture where everybody came in, and they’re saying, “Hey, you know, we got all the notes, we got everything, we’re going to share it with you.

” Okay, so then we reacted to it. Continuing, as this is going on. Patel privately shared many of Bongino’s concerns, but in an internal uh for weeks, Patel and Bongino, the deputy FBI director, had grown more infuriated as they realized the scale of the mess for which they were now being blamed, cuz the market was blaming them.

Now, remember, this is not an article that’s a pro Kash Patel and pro, what do you call it, Bongino. They don’t like Trump. They don’t like this administration. So, they they’re not fans of any of these guys, right? Uh Bongino hated the Justice Department nothing to see here memo had been drawn for public release.

He told Patel, “This would in no way align with the promises of transparency after taking over FBI.” And he objected to putting the FBI seal on his letterhead, but he was overruled. Patel privately shared many of Bongino’s concerns, but in an internal email on July 2nd, the FBI director gave his support to the memo.

“Thanks for the edits. I still believe this is correct. Vehicle forward.” Patel wrote to the occasional typo to small group of colleagues, including Blanche. “I’m happy to add any additional sentence to complete to compete the shortfall, but I do think we address specifically why more can’t be released as it relates to the specific topics, I court, etc., etc.

Okay. So, then it continues. Then you see the footage that comes out that the 1 minute was missing. We all reacted to it. I think we reacted to it God knows how many times on the podcast here. ; Just the jail video. ; And then all of a sudden, [ __ ] hits the fan. And watch this. The day the memo was released, Bongino showed up to a Justice Department meeting with the FBI staff and Attorney General. He was in a volcanic mood.

As soon as he entered the room, he erupted at Bondi shouting at her, “You effed this thing up from the start.” Bongino yelled. “The way you’ve been talking about this, that dumb effing charade with the Epstein files and they’re on my desk nonsense, all the promises to the folks out there.

” Patel and Bongino both subsequently told a White House official that Bondi needed to resign. Two days later on July 2nd, the two men were summoned to a meeting with Wiles and Bondi and the situation was complex. They were The last entered a small wood-paneled room. Seated around the table were Bondi, Wiles, Blanche, Taylor, uh uh Butterwich, one of Wiles’ deputies.

The moment Bongino sat down, Wiles told him that she had been informed, watch this, he leaked a sensitive story about Epstein and Trump to ABC News. And Bongino replied, “I’ll tell you what, I’ll give you $100,000 cash right now. I’m not kidding. Walk out to the West Exec, put the reporter on speaker and get him to admit I admit I leaked it to him.

$100,000.” Wiles snapped back, “Well, we all got ourselves into this shit.” And Bongino cut her off, “No, no, no, no, no, no. We didn’t get ourselves into this. I warned you guys about the whole time and you ignored me. And exactly what I said was going to happen, happened. And now you’re pretending I was in on this. I was never in on this.

” Bongino’s aggressive response to uh Wiles startled the others. She was the White House Chief of Staff, essentially a stand-in for the president. Wiles put Bongino on the spot. “Going forward, we’re all in. We’re all going to agree to move forward. Are you in or not? No, I’m not, Bondi know said.

This is not my plan. I’m not part of this going forward. Forget about it. I’m out of here. He stormed out of the situation room into the West Executive Avenue where he climbed into the back of Patel’s armored SUV and directed the driver to take him to FBI headquarters. Some of Bondi know’s close friends hoped he would resign right there and act of protest that would give him a mega martyr and only increase his following.

The White House advisor intervened urging him to stay if he quit Epstein and went public it would severely damage the president. Bondi know told associates he would remain for Trump’s sake and keep pushing for more Epstein information to be released. I got few more things to read here, but a part of it is Charlie Kirk’s which is this next part’s very interesting with Charlie Kirk in the story.

In a conversation with a confident he lamented that with the job cost of millions of dollars and podcast revenue, family time, his audience. One time he talked about it that my wife and I have been separated for 9 months. Not literally separated, but we’re not seen each other for 9 months. You can imagine how he goes from making 20 30 million a year however much money he was making to now.

; about Bondi know. ; Bondi know’s one of the biggest shareholders of Rumble by the way and he was the number one show there. And so Blondie effed this whole thing up. Bondi know later told a confident echo and lumbers the derisive nickname for the attorney general. She was the one on TV saying over and over again that all this stuff of what they never happened.

We were always clear about it, but now everyone thinks we did something wrong and I give up everything. Bondi know complained that he had given up his high rated millions of dollars and now it’s all about to disappear. So this is the part that gets tricky with TPUSA and and Charlie Kirk. ; Uh-oh. ; Trump told aids he was very unhappy with some of the most influential supporters including Kirk Carlson and Megan Kelly.

All of them were publicly urging the administration to come clean. Kirk had held a Turning Point USA event the previous day that turned into an Epstein grievance fest with one speaker after another speaker bashing Bondi over her handling the situation. Trump called Kirk and scolded him. Okay? This is the story.

Nobody in the Trump’s orbit had a better feel for the younger part of Maga base than Kirk who was who saw that the Epstein cover-up as it was now viewed was capturing attention to an alarming extent. Donald Trump Jr. and J.D. Vance, both of whom spent considerable time on X, were tapped into the same younger and hyper online portion of the base were also worried.

Charlie apparently um uh I think the TPUSA crew responded to this and said this call did happen and they remember when this call happened and the president was furious. I think TPUSA Andrew Kolbert may have said if I’m not mistaken they they responded to it, right? Yeah. ; Furious why Pat? ; Yeah. ; What is that? What ; Oh, this is the this is the the the tweet.

; Okay, this is a tweet. It was actually very widely supported at the time that President Trump called Charlie in July what is that? SAS? I don’t know what that is. SAS. Uh we had gone Can you zoom in, guys? Listen, I can’t read [ __ ] right now. Zoom in, yeah. Pretty hard on the Epstein topic at the conference urging for transparency. Student action summit.

I want to look at this. There were actually two calls that happened during the student student action summit. President Trump was pretty upset in the first call. This is true. He thought too many of his supporters were buying into the Democratic tactic to use Epstein conservatives. That was the first call was pretty sure, but then there was a second call.

I believe around 30 to 60 minutes after the call. I asked Charlie how it went. He said to me, “We’re all good.” Meaning he and the president had talked. Charlie said it was a warm call that the president told Charlie he was doing a great job and that the admin was working on the solutions. Charlie communicated that the grassroots wasn’t going to move on easily, but was glad to hear things were in motion.

I remember this well because he caught a bunch of bad headlines after the following Monday show for saying he was done talking about Epstein for the time being and he said he was going to trust his friends and the ball is in their court to fix it. Charlie was upset by the coverage because of that. So, I’ll stop here. Tom, your thoughts? What else you got from the five chapters you read so far? ; So, what I read so far two things came to mind.

Number one, there was dysfunction in the White House and this is not a newsflash and I’m not trying to criticize people. We know some of these people. We think highly of them, but it was clearly there was like a strategic dysfunction and there were multiple camps and there was not one unified uh point here.

And it also shows that the one person who is leading all of the law enforcement stuff, Pam Bondi, apparently made three mistakes. Uh mistake number one, she got recorded at a restaurant. That’s not rumor. That’s not speculation. That’s what happened. Uh mistake number two, they they put these binders out and apparently the Justice Department uh like Cash and um others didn’t know what was in them and apparently there was nothing new and when the media got a hold of one and looked through it cuz I think Benny got one.

Um yeah, a few people got them. And there wasn’t really anything new in that. And then her saying, “They’re on my desk.” and then saying, “There’s 10,000 videos.” but things didn’t come out of it. So Pam appeared to be saying things to the media coming out. And now we have very rational appearing reporting that shows that a lot of people were like, “What are we doing? What is the strategy, Pam?” Uh and the last that I got out of this, it really looks like Dan Bongino was a rational partner, an outsider

legitimately defending the president, trying to come to Washington, trying to make a difference, and immediately being in the middle of something heavy. And I I followed the timeline and I went back and right in the middle of what you were reading was when Kash Patel and Dan Bongino did a side-by-side interview and this wasn’t just what we said.

Everybody said, “Is this an interview with the Department of Justice between Bongino and Patel or is this a hostage video?” Yeah. They look like they were stiff, they look concerned, it didn’t look convincing, which is what you want. ; Everybody remembers that. ; And Epstein killed himself. ; The more I The more I read through this, Pat, the more I felt bad because it really seems like a dysfunctional So, war happened at the White House between these angles, and we see a lot of it here.

; my question for you. Is there anything specific you want to go to? Like anything specific that stuck your you know that you were like, “Holy [ __ ] this is bad.” ; this confirms why a Bongino left, this confirms why Bondi left. So, all the speculation, I think, goes out the door on this. ; But but but my question, Tom, is the umbrella, why? Why all the lying? Why all the deceit? Why all the secrecy all the way from the top? Because every This isn’t a Democrat tactic.

It’s When everybody’s talking about the cabal and all the people ; to stop you. I think you should say confusion, not lying. ; Well, we’ll talk ; lying from the top, I think it’s There was a lot of confusion here, and you know ; Wait, hold on. But were they putting out false information at all to the public about these people and and covering Tom ; I don’t know if it was Did Bongino or Kash say things that they believed at the time were correct? ; I’m not I’m not saying Kash and I’m just saying in general, you don’t think that

we’ve been lied to about this whole Epstein debacle? The putting up fake stuff in the holding up the the the binders and all that stuff, Tom. This seems like it’s made The the Andrew Cuomo talking about the Kirk video is a number one or a number two. Tom, this is way up there for me. This is We’re talking about underage people that they were trafficking and they were hooking up with and they’re talking about uh giving Ghislaine a pardon that would what at the goal the top of this whole thing looks like ; So, there’s there’s two things. By the

way, just so you know every one of these things I just read, I can visualize happening. ; 100%. ; What kind of conversations you think you have when you’re in the room and what do you think you’re trying to protect? Like honestly, what do you think you’re doing? Like you you know, you think when you’re in that situation, you’re going to come out and tell 100% of the truth on everything? What do you think you’re doing like in that position? No, seriously, I’m just telling you this is a shitty job.

You you there aren’t too many shittier jobs than dealing with the FBI and you know, dealing with, you know, these types of things that these guys are doing. But this there’s two things I want to ask here. Okay? And maybe this is the wrong question to ask, but I’m thinking about this. So, when they walked into the room and it’s Wilds, Bongino, and who else was in that room? ; Todd Blanche.

; And who else? ; And Cash. ; And Cash. So, this is the only question I got. ; Yeah. ; One of those four talked to New York Times. ; Absolutely correct. ; So, which one of those four did? ; Very good question. ; So, think about that. ; Todd Blanche. It’s not It’s Suzy Wild. ; think it’s Todd Blanche cuz that’s Trump’s lawyer.

; It’s not going to be Suzy. ; Nope. ; It’s not going to be Blanche. So, then it’s two. ; It’s It’s certainly Bondi. ; Yep. Or it’s Bongino. Now, here’s the question. Does this article make Bondi look good? ; Absolutely not. Why does it make her look good? ; No, no. ; Oh. ; Did you understand what what what I’m saying? ; Mhm.

; I don’t know if you understand what I’m saying here. What am I saying here? They They know what I’m saying here. Did you understand what I’m saying or no? ; Are you saying that it could have been Bongino? ; Who else? I mean, who else is in the room unless if there’s a drone, small little like a mosquito sized cam flying around and recording everything.

So, by the way, why why could it be Bongino? Why could it be Bongino? ; wasn’t cuz he’s not happy with the way that it’s going anymore. ; Dude, is there a person that’s taking a more heat for this [ __ ] than Bongino? ; Correct. ; Is there somebody that’s taking more [ __ ] for this than him? ; Nope. ; Everybody’s blamed him.

; Yep. ; Everybody is saying that, you know, what happened here. Now, by the way, this article, let’s go through this. Just ask this question, Tom. ; Mhm. ; Who does this article make look bad? Make the list of names. Let’s go through it. Let’s play game. Who does this article make look bad? ; Bondi. ; So, I want to go bad, horrible, neutral, good.

So, let’s go horrible, Bondy’s there. I think Bondy is horrible. Then you got bad, then you got neutral, then you got good, okay? ; Cash not horrible. ; Bongino look good. Does it make Cash look bad? Or is Cash like neutral? I think Cash is neutral. ; neutral but not horrible. ; Wiles? Where do you put Susie? ; Well, she’s doing a little damage control, but I don’t know.

; Bad or neutral? ; more neutral. She’s trying to do her job. ; I’m with you. Who else would you put Tucker? Where do you put Tucker? I think it’s neutral. He was going to do the interview. ; Yep. ; Okay, great. ; Kelly and all them in there, too? ; I think Megan Kelly is neutral. It’s not good, it’s not bad, it’s just neutral.

Let’s mention. Who else is good or bad? Where does Trump end up looking in here? ; Okay, so Trump’s going to be in the bad category. Okay, who else? What does J.D. look in this? ; J.D. Vance, I think he’s actually cuz Pat he What What was he saying here? He’s like, “Bro, he You guys Well, they’re calling him the the theorist, but he’s like, “Bro, I’m seeing the stuff. I’m seeing it.

” ; you want to put J.D. here? Just tell me. Where does he look good? You think J.D. looks good or bad? ; I think he looks good. ; Where do you put Tom? Do you think J.D. looks good? ; I I don’t think he looks good. I think he looks a little I like halfway between neutral and bad because they’re saying Susie Wiles said the vice president’s a conspiracy theorist.

; Yeah, but if he’s right, if he’s right That’s the point. So, that could be a good So, how about if I put J.D. as neutral? ; That’s fine. Like, who else do we have in the Who Who else do we have? ; does she look good, bad, or is she irrelevant? ; She’s going to look She looks who she is. She’s a sex trafficker.

; She’s horrible. So, we’re going to put Ghislaine here because they don’t want to have anything Blanche, how does Blanche look? ; Well, Blanche ; Blanche, like I said, Pat, used to be his lawyer. Now they put him as a I would put him as ; Neutral? ; Neutral. ; Okay, great. But But always when when stories like this come out, always pay attention to two people.

; Mhm. ; Those who look horrible, those who look good. ; Mhm. ; It’s that simple. It’s over. Do you understand what happened right there? ; And so, who was Who was the horrible one? ; So, guess what? ; Bondy looks horrible. ; Bondy is number one on steroids at the highest level, okay? At the highest level.

And who looks, you know, who looks good is Bongino. ; Yep, good for him. ; And and do you think do you think a Bongino sat there and says, “You know what? The hell with you guys. I had your back. I had this. I had that. I had this. I had that. I’m not messing with this anymore.” Do you think Bongino has access to New York Times? Do you think New York Times reached out to Bongino had a con- Do you think those things are going to be taking place? I mean, so a part a part of this is and I’m not spec- I’m not saying anything about Bongino. I can tell you

when you’re a man of character, one of the most annoying things where your brand like if you if you if you’re not known like some brands are not known as man of character. So, guess what when your brand is in character? ; The market tells you. ; No, no. You don’t give a [ __ ] You’re like, “I don’t give a [ __ ] You’re not I’ve never branded myself as a good guy.

; Mhm. ; I’m the I’m the I’m the heel. I’m the bad guy. ; Yeah, I did Charles Barkley was like, “I’m not your role model.” ; I’m not a role model. Yeah. So, but but Bongino’s brand has always been what? ; I’m a secret service I’m a stand-up guy. I’m honest. ; Pro-America. Yes. There is nobody that was more annoyed by what happened with Epstein than Bongino.

; Yeah. ; Nobody. ; Cuz he was ; And this article and this book gives redemption to Bongino. ; And he deserves it. ; That’s what I’m feeling so far and I may be wrong. I may be off, but that’s my thoughts. Adam, you. ; Look, I’m looking forward to the other chapters and the other things cuz regime change wasn’t just about Epstein.

; I I have two thoughts on this. I’ll isolate each one. Number one, I’ve always thought that Dan Bongino was a good guy. I mean, I I I don’t need to pat myself on the back, but I never got the impression that he was covering things up or he was a bad guy lying. I think it was a situation where he, you know, the whole Wizard of Oz thing, he took look behind the curtain, he saw what was going on and tried to make the the best of what the situation is.

But I have a different opinion on the Epstein situation and and I know it’s a little controversial. I happen to find Epstein situation a massive distraction being utilized by the Democratic Party. And what’s the distraction? At the core distraction, they could have done this at any given point. During the Biden administration, during Obama administration, why now? Well, maybe maybe it’s because during the Biden administration, who was the borders are? Kamala Harris.

Who was the uh What was Alejandro Mayorkas the Department of Homeland Security? How many millions of kids went missing? I’m sorry. How many millions of people came into the country? ; How many Almost 50,000 ; Hundreds of thousands of kids. Here’s some numbers for you. During the last X amount of years, 450,000 kids were missing. 450.

Do you know how many the Trump administration has found in the last 2 years almost? 150,000. Meaning they found they there’s still 300,000 kids missing. Now, what happens to these kids according to uh Mark Wayne Mullen who’s the new Department of DHS, um they were raped, they were sexually exploited, they were sold, they were drugged. Uh and then here’s the kicker.

Where were the vast majority of these kids found? They were all found in sanctuary cities. So, to me when I say the Epstein thing is a distraction, it’s because don’t look over here at the hundreds of thousands of kids that are missing. They’re being raped, being sexually exploited. Don’t look over here.

Let’s all pay attention to the Epstein class. Trump’s a racist. Trump’s a pedophile. Trump’s a Nazi. Look over there. Trump, Trump, Trump. But don’t look over here. Don’t look at the tens of millions of people that came into the country. Don’t look at the hundreds of thousands of kids are missing and been drugged and raped. Let’s focus on Trump.

Did Was Epstein a scumbag? Yes. Are there things that need to be held accountable? Yes. My whole contention is it’s been used as a distraction by the left and a part of the right that fell for this. And it’s all Epstein, all Epstein, all Epstein. And all these other people are left off the hook. ; No, Adam, sometimes you’re going to hire people.

Look, uh uh uh ; Am I You’re saying I’m wrong? ; No, no. He he hear me out. So, when you when you hire a an executive, you know, you’re not always going to get them right. You’re not. And trust me, I’ve gotten them wrong many times. And and the onus always falls on you or the people you asked that vouched for that individual, okay? Okay.

So, here they administration hired 4,400 people, give or take, when you go into the White House. Of the 4,400 people that you hired, you got the top 50 that are the most important job, whatever those jobs are. Bondi got a pretty big job. Now, the connection Florida attorney general had a massive job, right? Massive, massive job.

And guess what happened? She fell at her job. ; Yeah. ; At the highest level. And but that doesn’t mean this stuff didn’t happen. That doesn’t mean the Epstein stuff didn’t happen. It it it The Democrats are going to use Your enemies going to use whatever Your enemies never going to highlight your victories, never.

Like imagine like the guys that make negative videos about us. Go find one video that they highlighted something they do positive. That’s just not how it works. The market doesn’t work that way, right? And so it it And this isn’t like, you know, “Oh my god, you know.” No, this is how the market works.

The market is trying to look for change, conflict, controversy to sell. That’s what media makes money off of, those three C letter words, right? But to to to to undermine this and say this is not a big deal and now this is coming back in the front because you know what story kind of set this aside for the last 2 and 1/2 months? What story? ; Iran.

; Iran. ; Yeah. ; And guess what? Iran’s about to be done. And when Iran is done, well, Iran’s going to be done here soon. When it’s done, this was This is going to come back up. This is going to make a comeback. This ain’t going away. Ju- just so you know that. Like this is not going away anytime soon. ; think it’s going away.

I But but to your credit, yes, you said change, controversy, and conflict. But, there’s a whole narrative and I don’t want to take more than a second that they think that Trump started the Iran war to dis- as a distraction from Epstein. ; No, people are idiots. ; That’s crazy. ; That’s their job. Let them do That’s their job.

; But, I I I’m I’m learning the isolation thing. Is that Epstein thing a real thing? Is it a real problem? Yes. But, is it also being used as a as a distraction to cover up from all the dis- ; No, but could I say one thing? The situation at the border. Can I say one thing that you said that I ; You said Mayorkas was your number one enemy.

; Adam, 100%. No, no, I love that That’s a That is a huge problem in itself, and that happened this past 4 years. Epstein has been around forever, and it wasn’t the Democrats that said, “Hey, we’re going to release this, and we’re going to release that.” No, no, it was the Republicans, it was Pam Bondi, it was Cash Patel, and it was Dan Bongino.

And then they came in, and everything stopped because like you said, the the curtain was pulled back. But, this Don’t get me wrong, and he nailed it. Yeah, they they The Democrats didn’t start this. The Democrats went, “Oh my god, there’s a problem. Jump on top of it.” It was the Republicans, it wasn’t a campaign promise, but the moment they won, they’re like, “Hey, guess what? The Epstein files are coming out.

” ; me tell you what could happen here. Let me tell you what could happen here with the president. Because the president’s sitting here, like you you you can take different angles with Epstein on why this upsets the president, okay? So, the people that the the Democrats and the woke right who hates Trump, guess what they want this to be.

; They want this to be every day. ; they want Trump to be on the list because he did something with someone. ; Yes. ; They want to say he is part of that pedophile ; Yeah. ; the Epstein class. ; Yeah. ; So, he Not the class, cuz you could be part of the class cuz you have money and you’re in the circle, but actual action, having gone to the island, not the fact that Clinton went there, not the fact that Clinton’s painting is in a middle of a Epstein’s property that was given to him by Lex Wexner that’s, you know,

whatever $77 million gift out. No, no, don’t focus on that. We got to we got to take Trump out, right? Okay. So, number one is target Trump’s a tar- target. Okay. Number two is Mossad the target. Why? Because he used Epstein to give intel to all these powerful people back to the Mossad.

Do I think that happened? I’m I’m 80% that’s happened. I’m 80% that that and there’s no way Ehud Barak comes to your house 32 whatever whatever on the times. Oh, we’re just hanging out playing backgammon. Stop it. Okay, so there there is something going on there. So, that’s the second thing that they’re trying to figure out.

What’s the third thing? The third thing is you know, when it comes down to this is, you know, you’re dealing with the kids. We have to address this. We have to go Okay, no problem. To me, as you’re going through these different issues, the president, if he comes out all of a sudden and you know, he he says, “Look, cuz let’s just say the Mossad thing is happening.

” Let’s just say the Mossad Epstein thing happened. Get Who do you think’s the most worried about that if that did happen? I actually think if Mossad did use Epstein to gather intel ; BB ; on world leaders BB and who else? ; Israel. ; Yeah, of course. I I I have a different opinion, but ; But let me I’m just saying I remember I’m saying if ; Yeah.

; Everything here is ; It’s if. ; Okay. So, do you think if this keeps reappearing and annoying the hell out of this and people are saying that Trump is protecting who? He’s protecting the wealthy class, right? The the friends and people that gave them money, right? ; Donors. ; Okay. ; Okay. All right. ; Epstein client. Yeah.

; Do you think a part of that could have happened? Okay? Or maybe that’s the speculation that’s Okay. But if this next phase goes through and Trump is sitting here saying, “Hey, man, I am so sick of this.” Imagine if Trump comes out and says, “Look, I don’t know if Epstein was selling some intel to Israel.

I don’t know why Ehud Barak was uh at Epstein’s house all the time. Is Ehud Barak a Democrat or Republican? I think he’s a lefty, right? He’s a Democrat. Okay. So, if Trump goes there and says, “Hey, I don’t know why this Democrat from Israel is coming here. Do I think he would use Epstein to spy on everybody? I think that’s possible. I think if he goes and re you know, re adjust the messaging and allows the market to say, “Yeah, maybe there is a land let Israel defend the argument instead of you having to defend the argument.” I don’t know if you get

what I’m saying. ; I get it. ; Put the onus on somebody else to go out there and come out there defend the argument instead of you defending the argument. I don’t know. But, the reality of it is this story ain’t going away. ; I agree. ; It ain’t going away and you got to find a way to protect it and Bongino probably went out there and said, “Look, I’m I’m not going to have myself be the freaking punching bag.

” And there was a place Bongino was walking around with his wife and a guy came started saying, “You’re a You’re a pedophile protector.” I don’t know if you’ve seen this clip or not. ; the inside some event. ; Yeah, if you If you find this on X, you’ll see this “You’re a pedophile protector.

” It’s like, how many times can a guy with that kind of pride who does his best to be a good man, how many those videos can he handle? Not too many of them. Not not too many of them. Not not too many people can handle those types of things happening over and over again. We announced something on Monday for Father’s Day that’s around the corner.

And let me tell you, it was 500 Originally, we were only doing 200 boxes. We did 500 boxes. Peaches sent me a text right now telling me they have sold 403 with 97 left. And the hottest shirt out of all of them that’s selling, I want you to see what shirt this is. So, if you love your father or your grandfather, ladies, gents, take a moment and do this and spend something.

They say we spend $230 every Father’s Day on our fathers. A lot more for mothers, but we spend 230. Watch this video, you may be inspired to get something for your father or your grandfather. Go ahead. Folks, I don’t know if you know or not, but every year we spend $10 more on Mother’s Day than Father’s Day.

We don’t get things for fathers. We forget about it. It’s just the father. This year we’re doing something special. We got a box for all great fathers in the world that says the future looks bright. And here it says father, protector, provider. In the box, when that father, that special father opens it up, he will get a mug that says future looks bright with father, protector, provider.

He’ll get a future looks bright hat. They will also get a future looks bright RFID wallet. On top of that, a pen that says father, protector, provider. And you get to pick and choose four shirts for that incredible father. One of them is the best dad ever with future looks bright on the back. The other one will say father, protector, provider.

The third one is raising leaders, building legacy. I love every single one of them, but the last one’s going to be so special. You ready for this? It says grandpa knows everything. So, if you got a grandpa, send it to him, let him open. He’s going to be excited. We only have 500 of these boxes.

If you want to get one of these for a special father, go to vtmerch.com, place the order before it sells out. Having said that, happy Father’s everybody. Uh if you go to the website vtmerch.com, I want you to see what these shirts look like. So, on the website, uh uh refresh the page. Okay, right there. Click on shop now. So, if you go there, zoom in a little bit.

So, raising leaders, building legacies, father, protector, provider. Go a little bit lower. Go a little bit lower. You see right there, grandpa knows everything. And the best part about every one of these shirts, you know what it says on the back of it? Go on the Go on the shirt if you can. Go on the shirt and go back there you go. Go one more.

Boom, future looks bright on all of them. So, when you order the box, just make sure you choose the right side for the shirts, which one you want. And then also, be sure to choose one of the two hats between a red and a blue. And the packages will be mailed out uh next week to get to the folks that you wanted to get to.

So, having said that, go to vtmerch.com, place your order. And if you don’t want to order the box, you want to get 20 Father’s Day, but you know, hats for somebody, the best hat ever, just order 20. We had a couple people that ordered 20 shirts just to give away the shirts to fathers in their companies and their organization and their families.

If you enjoy this video you want to watch more videos like this click here and if you want to watch the entire podcast click here.

Disclaimer: This story is fictional and created for entertainment purposes only. Any names, characters, places, or events are fictitious or used fictitiously. No real person or organization is intended to be portrayed.

Recommended for You

View Archive arrow_forward