Glock 19 vs Ruger GP100: The Brutal Truth No One Talks About

It’s 2:00 a.m. A sound downstairs jolts you out of a dead sleep. Your heart is already pounding before your feet hit the floor. Somewhere in the dark, your family is asleep, and they’re depending on whatever is in your hand to keep them alive for the next 60 seconds. For decades, two guns have owned this exact moment more than almost any other.

The Glock 19 and the Ruger GP 100. One is the plastic striker fired pistol that half the police departments in America carry on duty. The other is a steel tank of a revolver that has been eating full house magnums since 1985. Gun forums have been arguing about which one actually wins this fight for 20 years straight.

And the arguments never really end. Join us today as we’re going to dig deep and find out why the gun that wins on paper isn’t always the gun that saves your life. Stick around because the truth here surprises even guys who have carried both of these for years. the stakes. Here’s why this comparison actually matters.

And it has nothing to do with internet bragging rights. When something goes bump in your house at night, you don’t get a doover. You get one gun, one magazine, or one cylinder. And however many seconds your hands remember from training, you may or may not have done. Every single feature we are about to break down isn’t trivia for a forum post.

It’s the difference between a clean stop and a tragedy in your own hallway. The Glock 19 is a compact 9mm striker fired polymerframed pistol. It’s smaller than the full-size Glock 17, but keeps most of that gun’s capacity in a package that’s easier to live with day-to-day. The Ruger GP 100 is a double-action revolver that can run both 357 Magnum and 38 Special out of the exact same cylinder.

These are two completely different philosophies of how to stop a threat. Built decades apart with different goals in mind. Let’s put them side by side where it actually counts and not where the internet says it counts. The goal here isn’t to crown a winner just to win an argument online. It’s to actually understand what happens to a gun and a shooter in the exact moment everything goes wrong.

Round one, size and handling. Start with how each gun actually feels moving through a hallway at 3:00 in the morning, half asleep and running on adrenaline. The Glock 19 was built specifically to split the difference between a full-size duty pistol and something genuinely concealable. That shorter barrel and slightly trimmed grip make it easy to bring around corners without snagging on door frames, furniture, or a bed sheet you just kicked off.

The GP 100 is not a small gun by any measure. It is a 40 ounce chunk of steel, and that weight is completely intentional. It’s there to soak up the punishment of magnum recoil without beating up your handshot after shot. In tight indoor spaces, both guns handle better than a shotgun or a rifle ever could. But the Glock’s slimmer, lighter profile gives it a real edge, moving through doorways one-handed, while your other hand is holding a phone or a flashlight.

There is also the daily carry question most home defense comparisons ignore. The Glock 19 was designed from the ground up to disappear under a t-shirt, which means the same gun protecting your house at night can also ride on your hip during the day. The GP 100 with its full underlug barrel and wide cylinder is not built for concealment.

It’s a home or range gun first, and trying to carry it daily is a much heavier commitment. Advantage here clearly goes to the Glock, but it’s not the total blowout most people assume walking in. The GP 100’s extra weight actually helps steady your aim when adrenaline has your hands shaking. And that stability matters more in a real encounter than most people give it credit for.

But size and handling are just the appetizer. The next round is where this debate actually gets heated and where most people are dead wrong about what matters. Round two, stopping power. This is where the online arguments get loud. So, let’s slow down and actually look at what’s happening. The Glock 19 fires 9 millimeter.

And with a modern defensive load like a 147 grain hollow point, it has proven itself for decades across police departments, federal agencies, and military special operations units. It’s controllable. It expands reliably in ballistic gel testing, and you can carry 15 rounds plus one already chambered. The GP 100 brings something the Glock simply cannot offer, and that’s caliber flexibility inside one gun.

Load it with full power 357 Magnum, and you are sending noticeably more energy downrange than any 9mm round can realistically match. That extra energy comes from higher velocity and often heavier bullets. And on a spec sheet, it’s a genuinely harder hitting round with a bigger margin for error on shot placement. But that power comes with a real cost.

And the cost is recoil. a full house 357 out of a GP 100 kicks hard enough that follow-up shots take noticeably longer for most shooters, especially anyone without serious trigger time behind a revolver. Some indoor ranges have even had shooters complain about the fireball and muzzle blast from hot magnum loads drawing attention from everyone around them.

Load that same gun with 38 special instead and recoil drops dramatically, but so does most of the stopping power advantage over a 9mm. So, here is the uncomfortable truth almost nobody says out loud in these comparisons. Raw power on a spec sheet means absolutely nothing if you cannot put the second and third shot exactly where they need to go.

A soft shooting 9mm that stays on target every single time beats a magnum round that goes wide because the shooter flinched from the blast. Power without control is not an advantage. It’s a liability wearing a costume. Muzzle flip matters here, too, since a gun that climbs hard off target forces your eyes and hands to fight their way back before the next pull.

And every fraction of a second in that fight belongs to whoever is threatening your home. Round three, capacity and reloads. Six rounds versus 15 + 1 is not even close on paper, and this is usually the exact moment people declare the whole debate over and walk away satisfied. The Glock 19 gives you almost three times the ammunition before you need to reload.

And swapping a magazine under stress is a drilled, repeatable motion that a trained shooter can do in under two seconds. The GP 100 tops out at six rounds, no matter how you load it. And reloading a revolver under real stress is a completely different skill set than dropping a magazine. Even with a speed loader, you are manipulating a cylinder release, dumping six empty cases, and lining up fresh rounds by feel, possibly in the dark with cold, shaking hands.

It’s slower, and there is simply more that can go wrong in that process when your heart rate is through the roof. Here’s what almost nobody actually brings up in this part of the argument. Most documented home defense encounters end in two shots or fewer, and a huge percentage end without a single shot being fired at all.

Six rounds sounds genuinely terrifying until you realize that the overwhelming majority of civilians never come close to needing a reload during an actual defensive encounter. The Glock’s capacity is a real measurable advantage. No question about that. But it’s solving a problem that statistically almost never shows up at your front door in the first place.

Round four, reliability under pressure. This is the round most shooters get completely backwards. And honestly, it’s the heart of the brutal truth in this video’s title. Everyone assumes a modern striker fired pistol is automatically more reliable than an old school wheel gun sitting in your safe. That assumption is not quite as solid as people think.

The Glock is famous for surviving abuse that would destroy most other pistols on the market. It’s been frozen solid, submerged in water, buried in mud, run over by vehicles, and dropped from serious height. And it keeps right on functioning afterward. But a semi-automatic pistol has more moving parts that can go wrong in the exact heat of the moment.

A limp wrist grip, especially from someone with smaller hands or less upper body strength behind the gun, can cause the slide to short stroke and fail to fully cycle. That’s a malfunction most untrained people, will not know how to clear while adrenaline is flooding their system. A double-action revolver like the GP 100 has almost none of that particular vulnerability built into it.

There is no slide to rack, no chambering step before the first shot. And a limp wrist grip does not stop it from firing at all. Pull the trigger and it fires every single time, regardless of how weak or awkward the grip happens to be. If one round happens to be a dud and doesn’t fire, you simply pull the trigger again and the next chamber rotates smoothly into place.

No clearing drill required. Under real adrenaline, fine motor skills degrade fast, and a lot of trained shooters lose the ability to run a precise clearing drill they could perform perfectly on a calm afternoon at the range. That single fact is exactly why a lot of firearms instructors quietly recommend revolvers for family members who are not dedicated, regularly training shooters.

It is not really about which gun is technically more durable in a torture test video. It’s about which gun stays forgiving of an imperfect, panicked grip when a spouse or a teenager has to grab it off the nightstand in an actual crisis. That’s the part of this whole debate that almost never makes it into the loud online arguments.

Round five, accuracy and sights. Accuracy is where personal experience really starts to separate these two guns, and it’s worth being honest about the factory shortcomings on both sides. The Glock stock sights are famously mediocre, small, and plastic, which is exactly why an enormous aftermarket exists just to replace them the day the gun comes out of the box.

The GP 100 ships with a fiber optic front sight paired with tridium for low light, which sounds great in theory. In practice, testing has shown the factory front sight can run noticeably wide, sometimes measured around 155,000 of an inch, which is far wider than serious precision work calls for. Combined with a shallow rear notch, some shooters find it genuinely hard to get a clean, consistent sight picture straight out of the box.

Both guns are mechanically capable of tight groups in the right hands. Neither one is going to embarrass you at typical home defense distances of a few yards to maybe 15. But if you’re the type who wants to fine-tune sights the moment you bring a gun home, budget for it on both of these, not just one. Round six, learning curve. The Glock’s manual of arms is genuinely simple, and that simplicity is a big part of why it took over law enforcement holsters nationwide.

Load a magazine, rack the slide once, and from that point forward, every trigger pull feels identical in weight and length. New shooters pick it up fast because there is almost nothing to think about beyond aiming and pressing the trigger straight back. The GP 100 asks quite a bit more of the person holding it. Its double-action trigger pull is noticeably heavier, often sitting somewhere around 11 lb compared to a much lighter singleaction pull once the hammer is manually cocked.

That heavier double-action pull functions almost like a built-in safety feature against accidental discharges. But it also means new shooters need real dedicated practice to stay accurate with it under any kind of stress. It genuinely rewards trigger control in a way the Glock simply does not demand from a beginner. For a household with one dedicated shooter who trains regularly and takes it seriously, that learning curve isn’t really much of a downside at all.

For a household where multiple people with wildly different skill levels might need to pick up the same gun, it becomes a much more serious consideration. Round seven, cost and long-term value. A brand new Glock 19 typically runs somewhere around $500, and that price has stayed remarkably stable for years, despite everything else getting more expensive.

Magazines are cheap, replacement parts are everywhere, and the aftermarket for sights, triggers, and accessories, is enormous simply because it’s the bestselling pistol platform in the entire country. A Ruger GP 100, especially a purpose-built variant like the Match Champion, runs closer to $900 at retail. Ammunition costs more, too, since both 357 Magnum and 38 Special typically run higher per round than 9mm in most markets right now.

The GP 100 is a longerterm investment for a specific kind of shooter rather than a budget-friendly entry point into home defense. The plot twist nobody talks about. Here’s something that almost never gets mentioned in these Glock versus Ruger comparisons, and it might matter more than any spec on either sheet. Quality control on modern revolvers has genuinely gotten worse across the entire industry.

And this is not just a Ruger problem specifically. One well-known outdoor writer recently bought a brand new GP 100 match champion at full retail price and discovered the cylinder gap straight from the factory measured under 20000 of an inch tighter than it was ever supposed to be. That gap is the tiny space between the front of the cylinder and the rear of the barrel.

And if it’s too tight, burnt powder residue and carbon fouling can cause the entire cylinder to bind up completely miduse. He ended up fixing it himself with a simple polishing stone in about 10 minutes, bringing the gap to a proper 5000 of an inch. But sit with that for a second. A brand new $900 defensive revolver left the factory with a manufacturing flaw that could have caused it to lock up solid during an actual emergency.

And it took a trained eye to catch it before it ever became a real problem. That is not a knock exclusively aimed at Ruger. It’s a reminder that no gun, plastic or steel, striker fired or double-action, is automatically immune to defects rolling off a modern assembly line. The real lesson buried in that story isn’t Glock versus Ruger at all.

It’s that whichever one you choose, you owe it a genuine inspection and a few hundred rounds of testing before you ever trust it to protect the people sleeping down the hall. The brutal truth. So, here is what most shooters get completely wrong about this entire debate. And it’s the reason this video exists.

They treat it like a boxing match with exactly one winner when the real answer depends almost entirely on who is actually going to be holding the gun at 3:00 in the morning. If you are a dedicated shooter who trains often, wants maximum capacity on tap, and prioritizes fast follow-up shots under stress, the Glock 19 is genuinely hard to beat on almost every measurable front. It’s simple.

It’s proven across decades of hard use, and it forgives a busy schedule that doesn’t leave much time for range trips. But if your household includes a spouse or another family member who isn’t going to put in regular trigger time, the GP 100’s point and full simplicity along with its total immunity to limp wristing might actually make it the genuinely safer choice, even while carrying fewer rounds on board.

The gun that wins is not the one with the flashier spec sheet. It’s the one that works flawlessly in the hands of whoever actually has to pick it up during a crisis. That’s the uncomfortable answer gun forums do not want to hear because it means there is no clean, satisfying winner to declare and defend in the comments section.

Both of these guns have earned their reputation the hard way over decades of real world use by people who bet their lives on them. The real mistake here was never picking the wrong gun between these two options. The real mistake is picking either one and then never actually training with it. So, which one would actually sit in your nightstand tonight? The Glock or the GP100? Drop your answer in the comments below and tell us why.

If you learned something in this video you genuinely didn’t expect, hit subscribe so you don’t miss the next breakdown like this one. Stay safe out there and we’ll see you in the next video.

Glock 19 vs Ruger GP100: The Brutal Truth No One Talks About

It’s 2:00 a.m. A sound downstairs jolts you out of a dead sleep. Your heart is already pounding before your feet hit the floor. Somewhere in the dark, your family is asleep, and they’re depending on whatever is in your hand to keep them alive for the next 60 seconds. For decades, two guns have owned this exact moment more than almost any other.

The Glock 19 and the Ruger GP 100. One is the plastic striker fired pistol that half the police departments in America carry on duty. The other is a steel tank of a revolver that has been eating full house magnums since 1985. Gun forums have been arguing about which one actually wins this fight for 20 years straight.

And the arguments never really end. Join us today as we’re going to dig deep and find out why the gun that wins on paper isn’t always the gun that saves your life. Stick around because the truth here surprises even guys who have carried both of these for years. the stakes. Here’s why this comparison actually matters.

And it has nothing to do with internet bragging rights. When something goes bump in your house at night, you don’t get a doover. You get one gun, one magazine, or one cylinder. And however many seconds your hands remember from training, you may or may not have done. Every single feature we are about to break down isn’t trivia for a forum post.

It’s the difference between a clean stop and a tragedy in your own hallway. The Glock 19 is a compact 9mm striker fired polymerframed pistol. It’s smaller than the full-size Glock 17, but keeps most of that gun’s capacity in a package that’s easier to live with day-to-day. The Ruger GP 100 is a double-action revolver that can run both 357 Magnum and 38 Special out of the exact same cylinder.

These are two completely different philosophies of how to stop a threat. Built decades apart with different goals in mind. Let’s put them side by side where it actually counts and not where the internet says it counts. The goal here isn’t to crown a winner just to win an argument online. It’s to actually understand what happens to a gun and a shooter in the exact moment everything goes wrong.

Round one, size and handling. Start with how each gun actually feels moving through a hallway at 3:00 in the morning, half asleep and running on adrenaline. The Glock 19 was built specifically to split the difference between a full-size duty pistol and something genuinely concealable. That shorter barrel and slightly trimmed grip make it easy to bring around corners without snagging on door frames, furniture, or a bed sheet you just kicked off.

The GP 100 is not a small gun by any measure. It is a 40 ounce chunk of steel, and that weight is completely intentional. It’s there to soak up the punishment of magnum recoil without beating up your handshot after shot. In tight indoor spaces, both guns handle better than a shotgun or a rifle ever could. But the Glock’s slimmer, lighter profile gives it a real edge, moving through doorways one-handed, while your other hand is holding a phone or a flashlight.

There is also the daily carry question most home defense comparisons ignore. The Glock 19 was designed from the ground up to disappear under a t-shirt, which means the same gun protecting your house at night can also ride on your hip during the day. The GP 100 with its full underlug barrel and wide cylinder is not built for concealment.

It’s a home or range gun first, and trying to carry it daily is a much heavier commitment. Advantage here clearly goes to the Glock, but it’s not the total blowout most people assume walking in. The GP 100’s extra weight actually helps steady your aim when adrenaline has your hands shaking. And that stability matters more in a real encounter than most people give it credit for.

But size and handling are just the appetizer. The next round is where this debate actually gets heated and where most people are dead wrong about what matters. Round two, stopping power. This is where the online arguments get loud. So, let’s slow down and actually look at what’s happening. The Glock 19 fires 9 millimeter.

And with a modern defensive load like a 147 grain hollow point, it has proven itself for decades across police departments, federal agencies, and military special operations units. It’s controllable. It expands reliably in ballistic gel testing, and you can carry 15 rounds plus one already chambered. The GP 100 brings something the Glock simply cannot offer, and that’s caliber flexibility inside one gun.

Load it with full power 357 Magnum, and you are sending noticeably more energy downrange than any 9mm round can realistically match. That extra energy comes from higher velocity and often heavier bullets. And on a spec sheet, it’s a genuinely harder hitting round with a bigger margin for error on shot placement. But that power comes with a real cost.

And the cost is recoil. a full house 357 out of a GP 100 kicks hard enough that follow-up shots take noticeably longer for most shooters, especially anyone without serious trigger time behind a revolver. Some indoor ranges have even had shooters complain about the fireball and muzzle blast from hot magnum loads drawing attention from everyone around them.

Load that same gun with 38 special instead and recoil drops dramatically, but so does most of the stopping power advantage over a 9mm. So, here is the uncomfortable truth almost nobody says out loud in these comparisons. Raw power on a spec sheet means absolutely nothing if you cannot put the second and third shot exactly where they need to go.

A soft shooting 9mm that stays on target every single time beats a magnum round that goes wide because the shooter flinched from the blast. Power without control is not an advantage. It’s a liability wearing a costume. Muzzle flip matters here, too, since a gun that climbs hard off target forces your eyes and hands to fight their way back before the next pull.

And every fraction of a second in that fight belongs to whoever is threatening your home. Round three, capacity and reloads. Six rounds versus 15 + 1 is not even close on paper, and this is usually the exact moment people declare the whole debate over and walk away satisfied. The Glock 19 gives you almost three times the ammunition before you need to reload.

And swapping a magazine under stress is a drilled, repeatable motion that a trained shooter can do in under two seconds. The GP 100 tops out at six rounds, no matter how you load it. And reloading a revolver under real stress is a completely different skill set than dropping a magazine. Even with a speed loader, you are manipulating a cylinder release, dumping six empty cases, and lining up fresh rounds by feel, possibly in the dark with cold, shaking hands.

It’s slower, and there is simply more that can go wrong in that process when your heart rate is through the roof. Here’s what almost nobody actually brings up in this part of the argument. Most documented home defense encounters end in two shots or fewer, and a huge percentage end without a single shot being fired at all.

Six rounds sounds genuinely terrifying until you realize that the overwhelming majority of civilians never come close to needing a reload during an actual defensive encounter. The Glock’s capacity is a real measurable advantage. No question about that. But it’s solving a problem that statistically almost never shows up at your front door in the first place.

Round four, reliability under pressure. This is the round most shooters get completely backwards. And honestly, it’s the heart of the brutal truth in this video’s title. Everyone assumes a modern striker fired pistol is automatically more reliable than an old school wheel gun sitting in your safe. That assumption is not quite as solid as people think.

The Glock is famous for surviving abuse that would destroy most other pistols on the market. It’s been frozen solid, submerged in water, buried in mud, run over by vehicles, and dropped from serious height. And it keeps right on functioning afterward. But a semi-automatic pistol has more moving parts that can go wrong in the exact heat of the moment.

A limp wrist grip, especially from someone with smaller hands or less upper body strength behind the gun, can cause the slide to short stroke and fail to fully cycle. That’s a malfunction most untrained people, will not know how to clear while adrenaline is flooding their system. A double-action revolver like the GP 100 has almost none of that particular vulnerability built into it.

There is no slide to rack, no chambering step before the first shot. And a limp wrist grip does not stop it from firing at all. Pull the trigger and it fires every single time, regardless of how weak or awkward the grip happens to be. If one round happens to be a dud and doesn’t fire, you simply pull the trigger again and the next chamber rotates smoothly into place.

No clearing drill required. Under real adrenaline, fine motor skills degrade fast, and a lot of trained shooters lose the ability to run a precise clearing drill they could perform perfectly on a calm afternoon at the range. That single fact is exactly why a lot of firearms instructors quietly recommend revolvers for family members who are not dedicated, regularly training shooters.

It is not really about which gun is technically more durable in a torture test video. It’s about which gun stays forgiving of an imperfect, panicked grip when a spouse or a teenager has to grab it off the nightstand in an actual crisis. That’s the part of this whole debate that almost never makes it into the loud online arguments.

Round five, accuracy and sights. Accuracy is where personal experience really starts to separate these two guns, and it’s worth being honest about the factory shortcomings on both sides. The Glock stock sights are famously mediocre, small, and plastic, which is exactly why an enormous aftermarket exists just to replace them the day the gun comes out of the box.

The GP 100 ships with a fiber optic front sight paired with tridium for low light, which sounds great in theory. In practice, testing has shown the factory front sight can run noticeably wide, sometimes measured around 155,000 of an inch, which is far wider than serious precision work calls for. Combined with a shallow rear notch, some shooters find it genuinely hard to get a clean, consistent sight picture straight out of the box.

Both guns are mechanically capable of tight groups in the right hands. Neither one is going to embarrass you at typical home defense distances of a few yards to maybe 15. But if you’re the type who wants to fine-tune sights the moment you bring a gun home, budget for it on both of these, not just one. Round six, learning curve. The Glock’s manual of arms is genuinely simple, and that simplicity is a big part of why it took over law enforcement holsters nationwide.

Load a magazine, rack the slide once, and from that point forward, every trigger pull feels identical in weight and length. New shooters pick it up fast because there is almost nothing to think about beyond aiming and pressing the trigger straight back. The GP 100 asks quite a bit more of the person holding it. Its double-action trigger pull is noticeably heavier, often sitting somewhere around 11 lb compared to a much lighter singleaction pull once the hammer is manually cocked.

That heavier double-action pull functions almost like a built-in safety feature against accidental discharges. But it also means new shooters need real dedicated practice to stay accurate with it under any kind of stress. It genuinely rewards trigger control in a way the Glock simply does not demand from a beginner. For a household with one dedicated shooter who trains regularly and takes it seriously, that learning curve isn’t really much of a downside at all.

For a household where multiple people with wildly different skill levels might need to pick up the same gun, it becomes a much more serious consideration. Round seven, cost and long-term value. A brand new Glock 19 typically runs somewhere around $500, and that price has stayed remarkably stable for years, despite everything else getting more expensive.

Magazines are cheap, replacement parts are everywhere, and the aftermarket for sights, triggers, and accessories, is enormous simply because it’s the bestselling pistol platform in the entire country. A Ruger GP 100, especially a purpose-built variant like the Match Champion, runs closer to $900 at retail. Ammunition costs more, too, since both 357 Magnum and 38 Special typically run higher per round than 9mm in most markets right now.

The GP 100 is a longerterm investment for a specific kind of shooter rather than a budget-friendly entry point into home defense. The plot twist nobody talks about. Here’s something that almost never gets mentioned in these Glock versus Ruger comparisons, and it might matter more than any spec on either sheet. Quality control on modern revolvers has genuinely gotten worse across the entire industry.

And this is not just a Ruger problem specifically. One well-known outdoor writer recently bought a brand new GP 100 match champion at full retail price and discovered the cylinder gap straight from the factory measured under 20000 of an inch tighter than it was ever supposed to be. That gap is the tiny space between the front of the cylinder and the rear of the barrel.

And if it’s too tight, burnt powder residue and carbon fouling can cause the entire cylinder to bind up completely miduse. He ended up fixing it himself with a simple polishing stone in about 10 minutes, bringing the gap to a proper 5000 of an inch. But sit with that for a second. A brand new $900 defensive revolver left the factory with a manufacturing flaw that could have caused it to lock up solid during an actual emergency.

And it took a trained eye to catch it before it ever became a real problem. That is not a knock exclusively aimed at Ruger. It’s a reminder that no gun, plastic or steel, striker fired or double-action, is automatically immune to defects rolling off a modern assembly line. The real lesson buried in that story isn’t Glock versus Ruger at all.

It’s that whichever one you choose, you owe it a genuine inspection and a few hundred rounds of testing before you ever trust it to protect the people sleeping down the hall. The brutal truth. So, here is what most shooters get completely wrong about this entire debate. And it’s the reason this video exists.

They treat it like a boxing match with exactly one winner when the real answer depends almost entirely on who is actually going to be holding the gun at 3:00 in the morning. If you are a dedicated shooter who trains often, wants maximum capacity on tap, and prioritizes fast follow-up shots under stress, the Glock 19 is genuinely hard to beat on almost every measurable front. It’s simple.

It’s proven across decades of hard use, and it forgives a busy schedule that doesn’t leave much time for range trips. But if your household includes a spouse or another family member who isn’t going to put in regular trigger time, the GP 100’s point and full simplicity along with its total immunity to limp wristing might actually make it the genuinely safer choice, even while carrying fewer rounds on board.

The gun that wins is not the one with the flashier spec sheet. It’s the one that works flawlessly in the hands of whoever actually has to pick it up during a crisis. That’s the uncomfortable answer gun forums do not want to hear because it means there is no clean, satisfying winner to declare and defend in the comments section.

Both of these guns have earned their reputation the hard way over decades of real world use by people who bet their lives on them. The real mistake here was never picking the wrong gun between these two options. The real mistake is picking either one and then never actually training with it. So, which one would actually sit in your nightstand tonight? The Glock or the GP100? Drop your answer in the comments below and tell us why.

If you learned something in this video you genuinely didn’t expect, hit subscribe so you don’t miss the next breakdown like this one. Stay safe out there and we’ll see you in the next video.