The Queen’s Secret Warning To William After He Dumped Kate – ‘Have You Done The Right Thing?’ –  Hw

Welcome to Royal Exclusive Rewind, your look back at the triumphs, drama, and defining moments in royal history. This week we rewind to 2007 when Prince William stunned the nation by dumping Kate Middleton. After years together at St. Andrews and with the world expecting an engagement, William reportedly ended their relationship with a phone call, leaving Kate facing the tabloids alone as weighty Katie.

But just months later the couple reunited at a costume party, and the breakup that looked like the end of their love story might actually have made it stronger. So, why did William call it off? Did he really do it by the phone? Did he almost lose the future Princess of Wales? And without their reconciliation, would the monarchy look very different today? I’m Matt Wilkinson, and this is Royal Exclusive Rewind.

Joining me to look back I’ll talk TV host Amara Gill and royal correspondent for Five News Simon Vigar. Right, welcome to you both. I mean, it’s it’s hard to imagine now that we see this wonderful twosome, we have a wonderful family of five, you know, they’re so united together as the Prince and Princess of Wales.

But let’s take us back right at the beginning. How did the now Prince and Princess of Wales meet, where and when? >> Well, Simon, I mean, you tell me. They met at obviously St. Andrews, which is I even applied to St. Andrews just thinking, “My gosh, a William and Kate love story for me, maybe.” That didn’t happen, spoiler alert. But yeah, I mean, they met at university, and it was a kind of romance, really, wasn’t it? >> Yeah, yeah.

Well, this is this is his first day at St. Andrews back in hadn’t met Catherine Middleton at that point. Yeah, so they were they were in the same halls of residence. It’s not a big university, it’s not a big town. It’s a very lovely town. And they were in the same halls of residence, St. Salvator’s. And um there were plenty of girls chasing William.

And the the number of people, especially from America, applying to St. Andrews rocketed in 2000. One of the people who wasn’t chasing him was Catherine Middleton. But he obviously that’s what’s attractive. And uh they got chatting about running and swimming. Um and uh they did a lot of running together. And they were friends for quite a long time in the first year.

They were dating other people. This is obviously the graduation a few years later. Um we still didn’t really know about um uh who she was at that point until they were they were pictured on a skiing holiday. >> Well, but the interesting part of this is that yes, they were friends. Yes, they knew each other. And yes, it was quite a close kind of knit community that at St. Andrews.

But there was there was the wow moment, right? The famous wow moment. >> Oh, the dress, yeah. Well, so this is at the end of the first year. And uh there’s a a charity uh fashion show. One of the models, as you can see here, is uh is Catherine >> full picture. >> It’s not the full picture. But so these are these are designs by students at this.

And I think he paid a lot of money to sit in the front row with his mate Fergus. And um and then when he saw uh Catherine come down, legend goes that he turned to his mate and he said, “Wow, Fergus, Kate’s hot.” As if it’s the first time he’s noticed. >> people do pinpoint that as the moment where he thought, “Oh, this is this is my friend who used to help me with my notes at university and we sort of live in the same house as at Sally’s together.

And whoa, who is she? You know?” >> >> So he made his move later on at at a house party. He didn’t make his move at the uh at the fashion show. But he made >> didn’t She didn’t take his advances that night from what we hear. >> No, I mean there may have been a a kiss, but >> I didn’t even know about that. >> There was there was there was a a nice kind of healthy relationship, as long as I say, at university.

Two young people, two good-looking young people, you know, getting together. They used to go uh they used to go to an ice ice place. Then they used to go up the coast and go to a fish and chip place and stuff like that. It’s just outside of St. Andrews. So, it was a proper relationship. We later learned about it.

Um they were pictured as you pointed out earlier. I think it was front page of The Sun. I think we got an awful lot of trouble for it uh because they were on a ski on on a skiing holiday. But look, it’s you know, it’s it’s it’s fine. Come on, they’re in a relationship. Um but we need to get on to the what we said on unthinkable thing that happened was that they did actually split up in 2007.

And we believe it was by a phone call, Simon. >> Yeah, and it was two So, 2 years after they had left university and uh there are various things going on and we all we all know, I think, that young love the course of young love doesn’t always run uh smoothly. Um so, he’s down at uh army camp in Dorset with his mates.

They’re learning to drive tanks. Uh she is in London with her friends. She’s working in London. I She at no point does Catherine say, you know, I I need commitment here or or I, you know, you got to you got to propose. But she wanted some sort of commitment out of him. Um and uh he his mates down in the army camp were saying, “Oh, you’re such a middle-aged boring guy.

Come out and do whatever.” And so, yeah, he ended it. But she played a blinder because uh she she hit the the night clubs of uh of uh London and was in all of the newspapers. So, it it wasn’t long before he picked up the phone. >> What would you do? How would you react if the future king of England phoned you up and told you sorry this relationship is over, something that you thought might end up with, you know, an ultimate royal wedding? >> I mean, especially as well, I mean, they’ve been together for so long.

They’ve been living together. They’ve been enjoying their time at university. This is obviously the time after. You start to question everything. What would I do? My gosh, I’d hit the wall. But I think what was uh really telling of uh Catherine at that time is actually her reaction to it.

So, she was obviously working as an accessories buyer at Jigsaw at the time. Apparently, she received the phone call. She went out the back, um and then she took herself into the car park uh and composed herself by all accounts. Um I think she did She kind of left work early, um but she was not public about it. You know, she didn’t go back in as I would probably do and go and have a moan about the situation and what’s going on in the breakup.

She actually completely kept it private and sort of kept to herself even after uh things were seemingly broken off, which shows you her strength of character and what type of woman Catherine is. >> She didn’t sell her story. She didn’t sell her story. >> She didn’t moan. >> As you pointed out, she did go out, but she was just going out, not causing any controversy or causing any problems.

>> Looks amazing. >> Yeah. >> We heard from uh Camilla Tominey, former royal journalist, that Camilla at some point got her phone number and just cuz she was a young buck journalist at the time thought she might call her and thought, “Oh, I’ll you know, I’ll go and do that and and just see cuz she what is going on and she’s out of the fold now.

” And apparently, she was just baffled by Catherine’s sort of amazingness over the phone where she just goes, “Well, I I haven’t commented on that, so I don’t think I’ll comment on it now.” Um and just that composure, you know, you’ve got a random journalist calling you up, you’ve just had a massive breakup, um it just shows you what type of woman Catherine is.

>> If it was a test, and it I don’t think it was a test, but if it was, she kind of it passed this period where they’d split up with flying colors. >> Oh, yeah, absolutely. I don’t you I It wasn’t a test, I agree, but uh she she she played an absolute blinder. >> Queen Elizabeth, Granny, played an important role here as well.

She had a a quiet word with uh William saying, “You sure that’s you’ve done the right thing.” She spotted Catherine was uh was a a good thing very early on. >> He changed his mind, didn’t he? >> Yeah, it was it was like weeks before. It wasn’t long, and he picked up the phone. >> I >> have been a sweet phone call when when that came through.

>> Well, I >> Hello. >> Yeah, you’re right about her playing a blinder because think she really did the paparazzi shots which are now iconic of how she was enjoying her life post him. She also enrolled in a sort of a boat race that was going to happen and she was just like, I don’t need you. And I think he realized women like Catherine are very few and far between.

You cannot find someone like that, especially for the position that you’re wanting to put her in in the future. And I think the reckoning came pretty quickly as you say, Simon. >> And we and so the concert for Diana which was it was the 20th sorry, it was the 10th anniversary in 2007. The concert for Diana, this isn’t it, but Harry and William organized that and and Catherine was sitting in the royal box sort of near them but not right next to William.

So we knew they were back on them. >> So this was yeah, they got back together in 2007, we believe. They met again at a party, deep conversation and then it was you know, it was it was back on again. And you know, obviously we know it’s a happy ending. William did propose and we obviously remember that the royal wedding, but at the engagement interview, it this this split up was actually was it was touched on and I’ll read what this is what Catherine said.

She said at the time I wasn’t very happy about it. Understatement of the year. But actually it made me a stronger person. You find you find things out about yourself. Maybe you hadn’t realized. I really valued that time. Well, was it good for them in the long run then that that they had this little small little breakup? >> Yeah, I think I mean most couples go through something like that.

So yeah, I I would say absolutely. That that quote say she was very hesitant in that interview. It was really interesting that engagement interview in in 2010. But she there’s something steely about Catherine. She’s she’s very impressive. I think. >> How much pressure do you think William was under to to get it right? >> Massive.

>> Oh gosh. >> Massive pressure. They learned the lessons from Diana being rushed in in a matter of weeks. >> of the pressure, I think. >> Yeah. So, Catherine was given, you know, they the Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth, they gave William time and they gave Catherine time, literally years to work out, are we going to do this or not? But once she >> fair on Catherine, I thought, as well? It was fair on her to in some ways make really sort of >> >> get her into the royal family in that proper way.

>> she had decided, she decided, that’s the moment in 2007 where she was looking for some sort of commitment. Not a ring, but she was looking for some sort of commitment which he then, you know, >> Where would the monarchy Where would the monarchy be now if William hadn’t met her at that party or hadn’t been a situation where he thought, I actually Catherine I want Catherine back.

Where would we be now? >> I mean, some of the other people that he was going out with, you know, I think believe Richard Branson’s daughter was one person that he had dated. >> of women who would want to date >> No, no. And and some sort of Hollywood people and different things like that.

He he was also into that sort of thing. And they were 24 when they when that breakup happened. They were extremely So, I think I agree it did strengthen their relationship and it was a great circuit breaker, if you want to call it that. Um but yeah, where would it be? My goodness. I mean, she Catherine is still one of the most popular royals ever.

She is blockbuster for the family. She is, in my opinion, the biggest um pulling card for them. Uh and I don’t think it would be the place that it is without her. >> One thing that the royals are world experts at, the one thing they’re world experts at, is spotting a fake. And William can spot a fake from a hundred paces.

And um and he knew I he just knew that uh he could trust he could trust her. And as you pointed out, during the the time they were apart, no stories were sold or anything like that. >> Was it a major turning point or am I overstating this? Was it, you know, if if if a sliding doors moment if they if William and the royal family had gone in different directions, was was this was this is decision for William to to rekindle this relationship.

>> Yeah, and it was the right decision and he was nudged into it as well. >> But it shows his fantastic judgment as well. I think it also shows that, you know, maybe he could have gone off with the Hollywood movie star or the model or whatever. But actually the good choice as a future monarch is someone like Kate and slash slash Catherine.

The audience will get upset with the the Kate comment, but someone like Catherine, I think it just shows his decision-making which has proven to be very effective was already in command there. >> She was She was Kate at sixth form and at university. In that interview he calls her Kate, but I can reveal that she was always Catherine through childhood.

She was always Catherine with her family and very early on, in fact, not long after this photograph was taken, she was saying to palace staff, “Can we say Catherine, please?” >> >> Can I say one thing that I hate and that’s when she was called Waity Katie? >> Yeah, I agree. >> thought was awful. There was headlines in some of the newspapers because it wasn’t anything to do with her weight, it was to do with the fact that she was seen to have to wait a long time for this man to pop the question.

I thought that was out of order. >> It was, yeah, it was and so the idea that Meghan is the first person coming into the family to have negative headlines is nonsense. They all They all have. Yeah, the Wisteria Sisters was was used as well because of the >> Terrible about Carole. >> Social climbers, yeah, doors doors to manual Carole, really sneary, snobby um stuff.

Um so they and she had to wait uh because as you say, William didn’t actually propose until 2010 because he had various military things he was doing and we were all reporting on. >> And they all lived happily ever after. Let’s Let’s be honest. When we see them, like we when we’re on engagements or when we actually see them kind of out and about, they are tactile.

They do often They do seem desperately in love when I when I see them together. They do seem extremely happy despite, obviously, the the cancer and everything that’s been in in the last couple of years. They’ve kind of gone over that hump. They do seem extremely happy. >> Yeah, yeah. You can’t You really can’t fake that stuff.

Um and they make each other laugh, which is, you know, true of of all the royal couples. Laughter is so important. You know, he’s one one of the very few people in the world he can trust implicitly all the time um with the serious stuff, but also share the light-hearted moments as well. >> Well, let’s leave it on a happy note. Let’s leave it on a happy note that you know, they did split up briefly, but they got back together and everybody’s all all happy now and she she’s his rock and I think he’s he’s lucky to have her. So, yeah.

>> beautiful children with the Middleton genes. >> Middleton genes. Right, thanks, guys. Appreciate that. Right, that’s all we’ve got time for on this week’s Royal Exclusive Rewind. My thanks to my guests, Simon and Samara, and to you for watching. Join us next time as we dive back into the royal archives to relive another unforgettable moment from royal history.

QQ4 Bob Dylan and Keith Richards have been close friends for nearly 40 years. The friendship began on a live television program in November of 1986 in the 11 seconds after Bob Dylan called Keith Richards music derivative on camera. Keith Richard’s response to that assessment, one sentence said without anger, without performance, with the specific directness of a man who has nothing to prove and knows it made Bob Dylan laugh.

Then made Bob Dylan go quiet. then made Bob Dylan say two words that people who know Bob Dylan say he almost never said to anyone. This is the story of those 11 seconds and the 40 years that followed them. The program was a live music interview special broadcast on an American network on the evening of November 3rd, 1986. The format was simple.

Two musicians, a host, an hour of conversation about music and the state of it. The producers had assembled the pairing of Bob Dylan and Keith Richards with the specific calculation of television producers who understand that two people with equally strong and potentially incompatible views about what music is and what it should do will produce better television than two people who agree about everything.

The calculation was correct, though not in the way the producers had anticipated. Bob Dylan was 45 years old in November of 1986. Bob Dylan had released Empire Burlesque the previous year and had been on the road for most of the intervening period as part of the True Confessions tour with Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers.

Bob Dylan was in November of 1986 in one of the most prolific and restless phases of a career that had consisted almost entirely of prolific and restless phases. A career that had moved through folk, rock, country, gospel, and back again, that had been declared finished at least six times by the music press, and at each time continued with the serene indifference of a river to the opinions of people standing on its banks.

Bob Dylan had been redefining what music could be. Since 1962, Bob Dylan had invented and reinvented himself so many times that reinvention had become his defining characteristic, not in the superficial sense of a performer changing costumes, but in the deeper sense of a musician who had never allowed his work to settle into a form that could be anticipated or categorized from the outside.

Bob Dylan understood influence and originality and the relationship between them better than almost anyone alive in 1986. Bob Dylan had spent 24 years thinking carefully and specifically about where music came from and where music was going and what it meant that those two things were always in constant conversation with each other.

Keith Richards was 42 years old in November of 1986. Keith Richards had been playing guitar professionally since 1962. Keith Richards had built a career on a foundation of American blues and rhythm and blues. A foundation that Keith Richards had studied with the systematic devotion of someone who understood that the tradition he was building on was not incidental to the music he was making, but essential to it.

that you could not understand what Keith Richards did without understanding where Keith Richards had come from and what Keith Richards had been listening to since he was a teenager in Dartford with American Import Records and a secondhand guitar and no teacher except the recordings themselves. Keith Richards had never pretended otherwise. Keith Richards had in fact spent considerable energy across his career making the lineage explicit, naming the artists, citing the recordings, insisting on the acknowledgement of influence that the mainstream music

industry had a long history of suppressing or ignoring or crediting to the wrong people. If anything, Keith Richards was more transparent about his sources than most musicians of his generation. Keith Richards had always said openly that the Rolling Stones came directly from the blues, that Muddy Waters and Robert Johnson and the specific tradition of the Mississippi Delta were not background influences, but foundational ones.

The music Keith Richards made was in direct and sustained conversation with that tradition, something Keith Richards considered not a limitation, but a responsibility and a form of respect. The interview had been running for 8 minutes when the host asked Bob Dylan about the current state of rock and roll.

Bob Dylan answered with the density and the indirection that characterized Bob Dylan’s responses to direct questions, turning the question over, approaching it from an unexpected angle, finding his way to what he actually thought through a series of observations that moved like a river rather than a road. Bob Dylan was not a straightforward interview subject.

Bob Dylan had been asked about rock and roll in hundreds of interviews across 24 years and had developed the habit of treating the question as an invitation to think out loud rather than a request for a prepared position. The producer Gerald Sherman said afterward that in the first 8 minutes of the interview, he had been slightly anxious, not because anything was going wrong, but because nothing was going anywhere in particular yet.

The interview had the feeling of two conversations happening simultaneously. Bob Dylan’s internal one and the external one visible to the cameras. And Gerald Sherman was not certain in those first eight minutes that the two conversations would converge into something. Bob Dylan talked about influence. Bob Dylan talked about originality.

Bob Dylan talked about the difference between music that absorbed a tradition and transformed it and music that absorbed a tradition and reproduced it. And then Bob Dylan made his assessment. And then Bob Dylan said with the precision of a man making a musical assessment rather than a personal judgment that the Rolling Stones work, and Bob Dylan was specific, naming Keith Richards as the guitarist whose approach he was discussing was derivative in a way that Bob Dylan found limiting.

Bob Dylan said it without hostility. Bob Dylan said it as a technical observation about the relationship between source material and the work that came from it. Bob Dylan said that Keith Richards played the blues the way the blues had already been played, rather than using the blues as a starting point for something that had not yet been played.

Keith Richards had been listening to this with the specific attention Keith Richards gave to things being said about music by people who knew music. Keith Richards did not interrupt. Keith Richards did not shift in his chair or display any of the visible signals of a person preparing a defensive response. Keith Richards listened to Bob Dylan’s complete observation all the way to its conclusion without interrupting and without displaying any visible signal of preparing a response.

Then Keith Richards said one sentence. The sentence was not a rebuttal. The sentence did not defend Keith Richards music or argue for its originality or challenge Bob Dylan’s characterization of what the blues meant in the context of rock and roll. The sentence was something else entirely, something that required a specific kind of confidence to say.

The confidence of a person who has spent long enough thinking about the same things as the person they are talking to that they can locate the exact point where their thinking diverges and say something useful about that point rather than simply defending their own position. The sentence acknowledged everything Bob Dylan had said, the assessment, the distinction Bob Dylan was drawing, the specific musical concern underlying the observation, and then turned it 90°.

Keith Richards took Bob Dylan’s own framework, the one Bob Dylan had used to analyze Keith Richards relationship to the blues tradition, and applied it back to Bob Dylan’s work with the same precision Bob Dylan had used to apply it to Keith Richards. Spare aimed. The sentence asked Bob Dylan something about Bob Dylan’s own music, about the relationship between Bob Dylan’s sources and Bob Dylan’s output that Bob Dylan had not been asked on television before.

The sentence did not attack. The sentence illuminated. Bob Dylan laughed. The laugh was not the polite laugh of someone responding to a joke. The laugh was the involuntary laugh of someone who has been genuinely surprised. The specific kind of surprise that a person of exceptional intelligence experiences when someone else’s intelligence exceeds their expectations.

Bob Dylan laughed for 4 seconds. Then Bob Dylan stopped laughing. Then Bob Dylan was quiet for 3 seconds in the way that Bob Dylan was quiet when Bob Dylan was thinking rather than performing thought. Then Bob Dylan said, “You’re right.” The producer in the booth, a man named Gerald Sherman, who had been working in television for 14 years, said afterward that in 14 years of live television production, he had never heard Bob Dylan say those two words in a public forum.

Gerald Sherman said he had worked with Bob Dylan on two previous occasions and had observed Bob Dylan in numerous other contexts and that you’re right was not a phrase that Bob Dylan deployed easily or often because Bob Dylan had spent 24 years being right about music in ways that other people eventually caught up with. And the experience of being right ahead of everyone else does not generally produce a man who says you’re right readily when someone else makes a point.

The host of the program, a journalist named Patricia Wells, who had been interviewing musicians for 12 years, said afterward that the 11 seconds between Bob Dylan’s assessment and Bob Dylan saying, “You’re right,” were the most extraordinary 11 seconds of television she had been present for. Patricia Wells said that what she witnessed in those 11 seconds was not a debate or a confrontation or a celebrity exchange of competing opinions.

Patricia Wells said what she witnessed was one musician recognizing another musician as an equal, which was in the specific context of Bob Dylan in 1986, not something that happened in public very often. The interview continued for another 42 minutes after those 11 seconds. The conversation between Bob Dylan and Keith Richards in the remaining 42 minutes was described by everyone who watched it as fundamentally different from the first 8 minutes.

The host, Patricia Wells, who had been conducting music interviews for 12 years and understood the difference between the performance of conversation and actual conversation, said that at approximately the 9-minute mark, something shifted in the studio. That the formal interview, architecture dissolved, and what replaced it was something less structured and more genuine.

Bob Dylan and Keith Richards talked about influence and originality and the blues and what it meant to build on a tradition without being consumed by it. They talked about specific recordings and specific musicians with the specificity of two people who had spent their entire adult lives thinking about these things and rarely found another person who had thought about them with equivalent care.

They talked about where music came from and where music was going and whether those two questions were actually one question or two. Patricia Wells said afterward that she had asked approximately four questions in the remaining 42 minutes because Bob Dylan and Keith Richards did not require questions. They required only a room and a camera and the shared understanding that what they were saying together was worth recording carefully.

She said it was the best interview she had ever conducted and that she had conducted the smallest part of it. After the program, Bob Dylan and Keith Richards were in the corridor outside the studio when the host Patricia Wells passed them. Patricia Wells said she did not stop because she did not want to interrupt.

She observed them for approximately 30 seconds from a distance. She said they were talking with the ease of people who had known each other for years rather than people who had met for the first time 2 hours earlier. She said that something had shifted between them during the broadcast that the broadcast had made permanent rather than temporary.

She continued down the corridor and did not look back. She said in her account of that evening that she had decided in that moment not to interrupt the conversation because some conversations are more valuable than any question a journalist might ask and that the conversation she had observed for 30 seconds in the corridor outside the studio was one of them.

She had been a music journalist for 12 years. She recognized the difference. Bob Dylan and Keith Richards have maintained their friendship across four decades. They have appeared together at various events, most significantly at the concert for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1995, where people who were present described them as inseparable for most of the evening, occupying the same corner of the backstage area and talking with the concentrated attention of people who only have a limited amount of time together and intend to use it

well. Bob Dylan has spoken about Keith Richards in interviews with the specific thoughtful care that Bob Dylan reserves for musicians whose work Bob Dylan considers genuinely important rather than merely culturally prominent. Keith Richards has spoken about Bob Dylan in similar terms with the specific respect of someone who recognizes in another person a commitment to music that goes deeper than career.

Neither Bob Dylan nor Keith Richards has made a public statement specifically about how the friendship began or about the November 1986 interview. Bob Dylan has not mentioned the 11 seconds. Keith Richards has not mentioned the sentence. The interview exists in the archive. The 11 seconds are there. The laugh is there. The two words are there.

What is also there for anyone who watches the interview from its beginning and pays attention to the shift that happens at the 9-minute mark is the specific moment when two people who thought they were appearing on a television program discovered they were actually talking to each other. What Keith Richards said in that one sentence has never been officially reported.

The people who were in the studio that evening, Gerald Sherman, Patricia Wells, the floor crew, the two camera operators, the makeup artist who was watching from the side of the set, have described the sentence in consistent terms. They have described its effect. They have described Bob Dylan’s laugh and Bob Dylan’s silence and Bob Dylan’s two words.

They have not repeated the sentence itself in the specific understanding that the sentence was said between two musicians on a television program and that its power resided in the specific context of that exchange and would not survive removal from it intact. What can be said is this. Keith Richards said something to Bob Dylan about Bob Dylan’s music that used Bob Dylan’s own observation about Keith Richards as its starting point and arrived somewhere that Bob Dylan had not anticipated.

Keith Richards turned Bob Dylan’s assessment 90° and showed Bob Dylan something about the music they had both spent their lives making that Bob Dylan recognized immediately as true. And Bob Dylan said, “You’re right.” Two words said by Bob Dylan in public on live television in 1986 to Keith Richards in response to a single sentence Keith Richards had said about music.

Two words that Gerald Sherman, who had worked with Bob Dylan on two previous occasions, said he had never heard Bob Dylan say in a public forum. Two words that Patricia Wells, who had been interviewing musicians for 12 years, said were the most significant two words she had heard in those 12 years. Not because of their content, but because of who said them and what it cost to say them and what it meant that Keith Richards had produced them in 11 seconds from a conversation that began with Bob Dylan calling Keith Richards’s music derivative. And Keith Richards and

Bob Dylan have been close friends for nearly 40 years. The sentence did its work in 11 seconds on the evening of November 3rd, 1986. The work has been ongoing ever since. If this story moved you, subscribe and leave a comment below. Have you ever said something to someone that turned a potential disagreement into an unexpected and lasting connection? Tell us about it in the comments below.

Share this with someone who needs to be reminded that the right sentence said at the right moment can completely change the entire direction of a relationship. Ring the notification bell for more untold stories about the extraordinary human beings behind music’s greatest legends.