The Vietnam War Unit That Hunted The VC With Dogs (You’ve Never Heard Of Them) JJ

You are on patrol in the jungle. The ambush comes fast. A few seconds of fire and then nothing. By the time your rifle is up, the enemy is already gone, melted into the green as if they were never there. There is no trail to follow and no sound to chase. Just the question every American commander in Vietnam kept asking.

 How do you catch an enemy who refuses to be found? The army’s answer was not a gunship or a battalion. It was five men and a single dog. And you have almost certainly never heard of them. What nobody realized at the time was that the answer had already been invented. Not by the United States and not in Vietnam. Years before the first Americans set foot in that jungle, the method was being worked out in a different war, in a different country, by a different army entirely.

 And the unit that finally carried it into Vietnam would be called the combat tracker teams. To understand how a Labrador retriever became one of the most feared tools in that war, we have to start in the jungles of Malaysia. In the 1950s, Britain was fighting a long, grinding counterinsurgency in Malaya [music] against communist guerrillas who used the jungle exactly the way the Vietkong later would.

 They hid, they struck, and they disappeared. To counter them, the British built small tracker teams trained to follow a cold trail through dense bush. And they sharpened the craft again during the confrontation in Borneo. This was slow, patient work. closer to hunting than to soldiering. Built on a simple truth. No man can move through jungle without leaving a mark.

 A bent blade of grass, a scuffed root, a print pressed into wet clay. And the British had spent years learning to read all of it. According to the American Legion, [music] when American commanders in Vietnam ran into the same maddening problem, they went to the people who had already solved it.

 soldiers were quietly shipped to the British jungle warfare school at Johor Baharu in Malaysia. So, here is the first thing most retellings get wrong. The tracker program was not an American invention. The whole method, the dogs, even the instructors came straight from British colonial soldiers. And because Britain and Malaysia were officially neutral on the war, the arrangement had to stay quiet.

 Historian Susan Merritt, writing for HistoryNet, describes American soldiers traveling on temporary government passports in civilian clothes carrying British kit so that nothing would tie them to the fight they were about to join, which looking back was either incredibly bold or incredibly strange.

 Depending on how you feel about sending your men to a secret school in someone else’s country, everything was in place. The soldiers just did not yet know what everything was building toward. Now, when most people picture a war dog in Vietnam, they picture a German Shepherd. And they are not wrong exactly. The army did use thousands of German shepherds, but those were scout dogs and sentry dogs, and their work was completely different.

 A scout dog walked point and warned its handler of an ambush or a trip wire before the patrol stumbled into it. It gave early warning. It did not give chase. The tracker teams needed something else entirely. They needed a dog that could take an old cold trail and run it down silently for hours. The army first experimented with blood hounds, and it did not work.

 As the military’s own combat operations research group noted, the blood hounds made such a racket following a scent that they gave the whole team away. The British had already landed on a better answer, and it surprised almost everyone. The tracker dog was a Labrador Retriever, the same breed families keep as a gentle house pet.

 And no, that is not a mistake. The reason is beautiful in its simplicity. Labradors had been bred for generations to retrieve birds shot out of the air, which meant they stayed calm around gunfire. They moved quietly and above all they were built to follow ground scent to find a downed bird in heavy cover.

 That last trait was exactly what tracking a man through the jungle demanded. John Dupla was a combat tracker with the First Cavalry Division. And years later, he sat down for the Echoes of the Vietnam War podcast, produced by the nonprofit that built the wall in Washington, to explain in his own words why the Labrador was the right dog for the job.

 They were already trained and bred to be silent and be around gunfire. And they had to develop a sense to re uh retrieve their game by ground scent because they they [laughter] didn’t care if a bird was shot out of the air. The the bird was on the ground. So where did the bird go? So they became very good ground scent dogs and they went after a specific target which was tracker was uh very good.

 So the labs one they didn’t bark. A lot of people ask us did we uh cut their vocal cords? They said no. The labs were silent. They were sturdy. >> So that is the correction worth holding on to. In Vietnam, the dog that actually hunted was almost never the German Shepherd of the popular imagination. Michael Lemish, who wrote the definitive history of American war dogs, documents just how small this Labrador program was, completely overshadowed by the scout dog program people remember instead. And it was never only about the

dog. John Dupla has described how the human trackers were taught to build a kind of sixth sense, borrowing methods from Native American scouts, reading broken twigs and overturned leaves and stones kicked out of place. The Labrador found the scent and the man read the story the ground was quietly telling. But knowing what the dog could do is one thing.

 Watching a fiveman team actually use it in the field is where this story takes a turn most people never expected. Each combat tracker team was just five men. There was a team leader and a visual tracker whose entire craft was reading the ground. There was a coverman who watched for the enemy while everyone else kept their eyes on the trail.

 And there was a radio operator and the dog handler with his Labrador. Earning a place on one of those teams was brutally hard. The course at the British Jungle Warfare School ran for weeks in the Malaysian jungle, and according to the American Legion, the failure rate was staggering. One veteran, Charles Stewart, remembered that roughly half of the non-commissioned officers washed out because they simply could not take it.

It is worth pausing on just how strange this war had become. The same conflict that produced a secret dog tracking school in Malaysia also produced a secret crossber campaign run by a unit called MACVS where the tracking often ran the other way with enemy dogs hunting American recon teams through Laos and Cambodia.

If that hidden side of the war is what pulls you in, I have poured years of that research into a book and the link is in the description at truevietnamdoccks.com. Now, back to the trail. The teams did not go looking for a fight. They were called in after one. When a patrol was ambushed or when an enemy [music] force broke contact and simply vanished, the trackers were flown in to pick up the trail while it was still warm.

 And tracking a fleeing enemy was only half the job. The same teams were sent to find downed pilots and soldiers who had gone missing in the bush, following a human trail through country that could swallow a man whole. Depending on the ground, either the visual tracker or the dog led the way. The visual tracker could study a single footprint and tell you how many men had passed, how heavy their loads were, which way they were moving, and how long ago.

 The Labrador worked the scent no human eye could see. Right behind whoever was leading came the coverman because the person reading the trail had his attention locked on the ground, not on the treeine. And this is the honest heart of the story, the part the title cannot quite capture on its own.

 The trackers were usually not the ones who pulled the trigger. Their job was to find the enemy and fix his position, then bring the infantry forward to do the fighting. As former special forces soldier and historian Gordon Rottman put it, it was not so much the team that did the engaging. They would be accompanied by a conventional unit.

 The dogs and their handlers were hunters in the oldest sense of that word. They closed the distance. Someone else closed the fight. If stories like this one, the units that got quietly written out of the popular history, are the reason you are still here, take a second to subscribe. It genuinely helps us keep digging through the archives instead of recycling the same tired myths everyone else does.

 So, the trackers could find almost anyone. But the better they got, the more dangerous their own lives became. Consider a black Labrador known by the tattoo inside his ear. Sam, handled by a young soldier the others called [music] Animal Norwood. British trained, Sam arrived in country in the summer of 1967 and went straight to work with a tracker platoon of the first cavalry.

Dogs like Sam grew so effective that by the tracker veterans own accounts, the enemy placed a bounty on the tracker teams and their dogs. A five-man team and a retriever had become valuable enough that the other side wanted them dead specifically. That effectiveness would eventually come back around on the dogs themselves, but that is getting ahead of the story.

 So, how well did it actually work here? We have to be careful because the program was secret and secret units do not leave behind tidy statistics. The credit for enemy killed almost always went to the infantry the trackers guided, not to the trackers. What we can say comes mostly from the veterans themselves.

 Susan Merritt, who wrote a full history of the teams, estimates that of roughly 750 combat trackers who served, 43 were killed in action, while carefully noting that the records are incomplete. John Dupla has said that just 54 Labradors served the entire American program. Set that against the roughly 5,000 German Shepherds in Vietnam, and you begin to see how tiny and how overlooked these teams really were.

 You would think word of a unit like that would get around. Mostly, it did not. And yet, the soldiers who worked alongside them knew exactly what they were worth. A 1968 assessment from the Australian Infantry Center, cited by the history publication Project Upland, called the tracker teams the only truly effective way of pursuing the Vietkong once contact had been lost.

 By 1971, a different kind of clock was running against the trackers. The war was winding down, American units were going home, and a hard question was coming for every dog in Vietnam. When the fighting ended, the dogs did not come with them. Officially, military working dogs were classified as equipment, and equipment does not earn a ticket back to the United States.

 Most were handed over to the South Vietnamese Army or simply left behind. According to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, of the thousands of dogs the United States sent to Vietnam across every role, only around 200 ever made it home to retire. That figure covers every kind of war dog.

 The scouts and the centuries and the trackers all counted together. Because even now, no one kept a clean tally of the Labradors alone. What is not in dispute is the scale of what got left behind. The men who had trusted these dogs with their lives and who owed their lives to them in return had to leave them on the tarmac. Many handlers have spent the decades since trying to make peace with that.

The Australians who ran their own Labrador tracker program faced the very same heartbreak and their dogs were left behind too over fears of tropical disease. The Australian War Memorial still keeps the collar tag of one of them, a tracker dog named Caesar. It took a long time for any of this to change.

 In the year 2000, an American law known as Robbiey’s Law finally ended the default policy of leaving military dogs behind so that a retired working dog could be adopted into a home instead of abandoned. It arrived far too late for the Labradors of Vietnam. So why does a forgotten fiveman unit still matter now? Because the idea did not die with the program.

 Every time a modern military working dog sniffs out a roadside bomb or tracks a fighter through rough country, it is running on lessons those combat tracker teams and their British teachers proved in the jungle first. The doctrine outlived [music] the dogs. When American and Allied forces returned to serious tracking work in later wars, they reached for the same steady Labrador temperament and the same patient method the British had handed over in Malaysia.

The Labrador that almost nobody pictured as a weapon turned out to be one of the quietest and most effective tools the army had. And for a long time, almost no one remembered the men and the dogs who made it work. There is a memorial now at Lackland Air Force Base honoring the war dogs of America.

 For years, the plan was to feature only a German Shepherd. It was a tracker veteran John Dupla himself who pushed until the Labrador Retriever was added to the bronze standing beside the Shepherd, the Doberman, and the Belgian Malininoa. It is a small thing, but it means that somewhere cast in metal, the quiet dog that hunted the Vietkong finally stands where people can see it, which is more than most of them ever got.

 If you want to keep pulling on the threads of the war that never made the textbooks, we have more coming, including the Marine tank crews who fought house to house through the rubble of Hugh. Subscribe and we will see you in the next